Inland Use of Marine Resources

Marine fauna constituted a distinctive and important set of resources for prehistoric San Diegans. Their archaeological residues are found primarily at processing and habitation sites located within 1-2 kilometers of the coast. However, smaller quantities of marine remains, particularly shell, occur at sites farther inland. Terry L. Jones (1992:2) suggested the use of 10 kilometers from the coast as the cutoff distance for distinguishing a “coastal foraging radius” from a zone of “terrestrial habitat away from the coast.”

The interpretation of marine residues at inland sites may shed light on prehistoric mobility patterns, exchange systems, and the uses to which marine resources were put. Several scenarios may be suggested to explain the occurrence of marine faunal remains at inland sites:

  • The shell or bone may represent a food resource that was brought to an inland base by foraging parties that had made extended trips to the coast.
  • The marine faunal remains may represent food resources acquired by residents of inland communities through exchange with their coast-based procurers.
  • The remains may represent food resources that were carried inland at the time of a seasonal shift from a coastal to an inland settlement base. This was the interpretation offered by Leslie Quintero (1987) for marine fish bone recovered from the Deer Springs Site (SDM-W-223A). Quintero reported seasonality studies indicating that the fish found at the site had been procured during the warm months, probably late summer or early fall, whereas the occupation of the site had occurred primarily from fall through spring.
  • The marine shell may represent debris from the manufacture of shell beads, ornaments, or shell tools. Arguing against this interpretation are the observations that the shell species most commonly represented among the inland residues were not typically used for beads or ornaments, and that shell tools seem to be rare at either coastal or inland sites in this region.
  • Shell may have been utilized as a material in crushed form, perhaps for its color or its chemical properties. Shell was apparently used in other regions to neutralize the tannic acid of unleached acorns. If the material was used for such purposes in inland San Diego County, it is important to note that usable shell might have been collected from geologic sources and that interpretations based on radiocarbon dating of the shell or based on the marine habitats associated with the shellfish might be fallacious.
  • Shells may have served as charms, children’s toys, or other items valued for their novelty rather than for any utilitarian function. The interpretive cautions noted above concerning geological sources for such shell would apply in this case as well. 

PROSPECTS

Future archaeological investigations may be able to clarify the ways in which inland communities made use of marine resources. Relevant aspects of the issue may include the chronology of such use, the specific invertebrate and vertebrate resources that were selected, their use for subsistence or other purposes, and the processing strategies that were employed.

Site Distance from Coast (km) Abundance of Fish Bone Abundance of Shell Shellfish Genera References
SDI-149, etc. 11 trace Astraea,
Mytilus,
Chione,
4 others
Carrico et al. 1991
SDI-186, etc. 18 trace trace Laevicardium,
Chione,
7 others
Byrd et al. 1993
SDI-674 19 trace trace Donax,
Chione,
4 others
Rosen 1984
SDI-731 37 trace Argopecten,
Tivela,
11 others
Waugh 1986
SDI-860 65 trace Chione,
Argopecten,
Donax,
Tivela,
2 others
True 1970
SDI-2537 92 trace Wilke et al. 1986
SDI-4608 32 trace Tuma 2004
SDI-4648, etc. 19 trace trace Trachycardium,
5 others
Cardenas and Van Wormer 1984
SDI-4763, etc. 18 trace Haliotis,
Chione
Rosen 1982
SDI-4807, etc. 21 moderate Donax,
Argopecten,
Chione,
12 others
Cook 1978
SDI-5383 13 trace trace Chione,
Argopecten,
Polinices
Laylander 1989
SDI-5669 22 moderate Chiton,
Laevicardium,
Tivela,
19 others
Berryman 1981
SDI-5680 28 trace trace 11 genera Dominici 1985
SDI-5935, etc. 18 trace Kyle 1987
SDI-6153 32 trace moderate Mytilus,
Chione,
Argopecten,
Astraea
Christenson 1981
SDI-9203, etc. 53 trace trace Phillips and Carrico 1986
SDI-9243, etc. 17 trace trace Chione,
Argopecten,
7 others
Corum and White 1986; Corum 1986
SDI-9446, etc. 49 trace Laylander and Christenson 1986
SDI-9476 19 trace moderate Mytilus,
10 others
Hector 1984
SDI-10,998, etc. 11 trace moderate Chione,
Tivela,
Argopecten,
Mytilus,
14 others
Laylander 1992a
SDM-W-223A 20 moderate moderate Chione,
Donax,
Argopecten,
21 others
Quintero 1987
SDM-W-1556 14 trace trace Chione,
Argopecten,
5 others
O’Neil 1982
Kitchen Creek 58 trace Argopecten,
Chione,
2 others
May 1975